«
»

Guns vs. Ninjas

A lot of people seem to be in favor of gun control. Oddly enough, it’s usually liberals too. That’s always seemed inconsistent to me. Conservatives normally seem to be hell bent on eradicating civil liberties for “the greater good” while liberals run around spouting their favorite Benjamin Franklin quote about how bad of an idea that is. Except on the gun issue. Why the exception there?

What both sides never seem to mention is the ninja. That’s the real reason we need guns to remain legal. Without firearms, ninjas and their throwing stars would be more or less unstoppable. That’s why guns were invented in the first place. To stop ninjas. If we took away guns, and still let ninjas with their superior firearms roam free, our government would certainly be overthrown in a matter of hours.

Just a thought.


This entry was posted on September 20, 2007 at 1:52 am and is filed under Opinions You Would Agree With If You Weren\'t An Idiot . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed Both comments and pings are currently closed.

3 Responses to “Guns vs. Ninjas”

  1. Ivan Says:
    September 26, 2007 at 10:38 am

    That's the problem with a 1D political spectrum. Libertarians in favor of gun rights and the right to screw any adult you want are not the same as conservatives.

    Also, as far an Ninjas, there are laws about levels are martial arts that designate people as “deadly weapons”. This might be a Cali only thing a 3rd degree black belt is a leathal weapon, and the state registers them.

    For example, if you get pulled over driving a car registered by a deadly weapon of a person, the cop can approach you like any aggressive target, gun pulled.

    But most ninjas are libertarians fearing the state, so they avoid any public record.

  2. mattmaroon Says:
    September 30, 2007 at 1:27 am

    In that case, there's a pretty good chance my fists require a license. I'll try not to make any.

Comments are closed.